My Latest Apple Frustration
As someone who spends a lot of time building bots and tweaking code, I’m no stranger to bugs. They’re part of the process. What’s not part of the process, or at least shouldn’t be, is having your bug reports randomly closed without any real resolution. And yet, here we are, talking about Apple again.
I’ve been knee-deep in a project that, like many of my bots, interacts with various systems, including some Apple frameworks. Naturally, when I hit a wall, I do what any good developer does: I report the bug. The idea is to contribute to making the tools better for everyone. But Apple seems to have a different idea about how this works.
The “Verify It’s Still Broken” Loop
The problem isn’t just that bugs go unfixed – that happens everywhere. The issue is Apple’s habit of closing bug reports with a request that amounts to: “Verify this bug still exists.” This isn’t just a one-off thing; it’s a recurring pattern, and it’s incredibly frustrating for builders like me who are trying to make things work.
Think about it from my perspective. I’ve spent time isolating an issue, writing up a clear report, and sometimes even providing sample code that shows the problem. Then, weeks or months later, I get a notification that the report is closed. Not because it’s fixed, but because Apple wants me to re-verify it. This often happens without any indication that they even tried to reproduce it on their end, or that any changes were made that might have incidentally fixed it.
Why This Hurts Developers (and My Bot Projects)
For me, this translates into wasted time and effort. When I’m building a bot, I need reliable tools. If a component of an Apple framework is buggy, it directly impacts my ability to deliver a stable bot. Reporting bugs is my way of flagging those issues, so I can hopefully get a fix, or at least a workaround, and then move on.
When a report is closed with a “verify it still exists” request, it puts the onus back on me. I then have to:
- Go back to the old project or setup.
- Re-run the tests that exposed the bug in the first place.
- Often, update to the latest OS or framework version (which might introduce new bugs or break my existing work).
- Spend more time just to prove a bug is still a bug.
This isn’t productive. My time is better spent building new features for my bots, optimizing their performance, or squashing *new* bugs that inevitably pop up. It’s not well spent re-verifying old ones that should have been investigated by the vendor in the first place.
What Apple Could Do Better
If Apple wants developers to contribute to a better ecosystem, they need to show that developer contributions are valued. Simply closing reports and asking us to re-verify feels like a way to clear out their backlog without actually addressing the underlying issues.
A better approach would be to:
- Communicate clearly: If a bug report is being closed, state *why*. Was it reproduced? Was a fix implemented? Is it a known limitation?
- Provide context: If they’re asking for re-verification, indicate what changes (if any) have been made that might impact the bug. This would help me narrow down my re-testing.
- Prioritize: Show that they’re actually looking at these reports. It feels like many reports just sit in a queue until they hit some arbitrary “re-verify” trigger.
Until then, it’s just another hurdle in the already challenging world of bot building. And honestly, it makes me think twice about spending my valuable time reporting bugs to Apple in the first place, which isn’t good for anyone.
🕒 Published: