OpenAI’s plan to tax the robots that replace us and redistribute the wealth sounds generous until you realize they’re asking for $100 billion upfront to build those robots in the first place.
The company behind ChatGPT is preparing for a 2026 IPO that could value it at $1 trillion. That’s not a typo. One trillion dollars for a company that’s been around since 2015. To get there, they’re currently raising up to $100 billion in funding, with Saudi Arabia reportedly setting up a $40 billion AI investment fund. The money is flowing in from sovereign wealth funds across the Middle East, which tells you everything about who’s really betting on this future.
The Pitch: We’ll Break It, Then We’ll Fix It
Sam Altman and OpenAI have released a blueprint for what they’re calling an “AI-driven economy.” The proposal includes taxes on AI profits, public wealth funds that give every citizen a stake in AI growth, and expanded safety nets to address job loss and inequality. It sounds almost socialist, except it’s coming from a company racing to become one of the most valuable corporations in human history.
Here’s what bothers me as someone who builds bots for a living: this is a solution to a problem they’re actively creating. OpenAI is developing AI systems specifically designed to automate knowledge work, customer service, coding, writing, and analysis. They’re not stumbling into job displacement as an unfortunate side effect. It’s the product.
The Bot Builder’s Perspective
I spend my days building conversational AI and automation systems. Every bot I deploy makes someone’s job easier, but it also makes someone’s job smaller. Sometimes it makes that job disappear entirely. The companies hiring me aren’t doing it out of curiosity. They’re doing it because the math works: one bot costs less than one employee, and it doesn’t take vacation.
OpenAI’s models are the engine behind much of this automation. Their APIs power countless bots, assistants, and automated systems. When they talk about taxing AI profits, they’re talking about taxing the revenue generated by the very displacement they’re enabling. It’s like an arsonist proposing a fire insurance scheme.
The Trillion Dollar Question
A $1 trillion valuation means investors believe OpenAI will generate returns that justify that price. Those returns have to come from somewhere. They come from businesses using AI to reduce costs, which primarily means reducing headcount. The same automation that’s supposed to fund these public wealth funds is the automation that creates the need for them.
The proposal for public wealth funds is interesting in theory. Every citizen gets a stake in AI-driven economic growth, regardless of their employment status. But the details matter enormously. Who controls these funds? How are the taxes calculated? What counts as “AI profit” when AI is embedded in everything? A company using ChatGPT to handle customer service isn’t an AI company, but they’re definitely profiting from AI-driven cost reduction.
What This Means for Builders
For those of us building with these tools, OpenAI’s vision presents a strange contradiction. We’re being handed increasingly powerful APIs and models to automate work, while the company providing those tools acknowledges that this automation will require massive social restructuring to avoid catastrophe.
The four-day workweek sounds nice. Public wealth funds sound nice. But these are band-aids on a wound that hasn’t been inflicted yet. We’re pre-negotiating the terms of a future that OpenAI is actively constructing, and they’re asking for $100 billion to speed up the construction.
I’m not against AI. I build with it every day. But there’s something deeply uncomfortable about a company simultaneously promising to automate vast swaths of the economy and positioning itself as the architect of the social safety net that will catch the fallout. It’s not altruism. It’s vertical integration of an entire economic transformation.
The bots are coming. OpenAI is making sure of it. Whether their proposed fixes actually work is something we’ll find out after they’ve already cashed out at a trillion-dollar valuation.
🕒 Published: